https://www.chiliproject.org/2011-10-26T20:16:33+02:00ChiliProjectChiliProject - Feature #673: Require rmagick >= 2.0.0 in Gemfilehttps://www.chiliproject.org/issues/673?journal_id=103742011-10-26T20:16:33+02:00Holger Justchiliproject@meine-er.de
<ul><li><strong>Start date</strong> set to <i>2011-10-26</i></li><li><strong>Estimated time</strong> deleted ()</li><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Normal</i> to <i>Normal</i></li><li><strong>Project</strong> set to <i>ChiliProject</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>3.0.0</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted ()</li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>0</i></li><li><strong>Subject</strong> set to <i>Require rmagick >= 2.0.0 in Gemfile</i></li><li><strong>Category</strong> deleted ()</li><li><strong>Tracker</strong> set to <i>Feature</i></li><li><strong>Due date</strong> deleted ()</li><li><strong>Subproject of</strong> deleted ()</li><li><strong>Description</strong> set to <i>In #458 we updated the Gemfile to allow the usage of rmagick 2 (which is requ...</i> <a href="/journals/10374/diff/description" class="lightbox-ajax">More</a></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Open</i></li></ul> ChiliProject - Feature #673: Require rmagick >= 2.0.0 in Gemfilehttps://www.chiliproject.org/issues/673?journal_id=30872011-12-10T00:49:49+01:00Eric Davis
<ul></ul><p>Is the only thing needed for this a change to the Gemfile?</p>
<p>If so I'm fine doing this. If not, then we should bump it out of 3.0.0 until it's ready.</p> ChiliProject - Feature #673: Require rmagick >= 2.0.0 in Gemfilehttps://www.chiliproject.org/issues/673?journal_id=115032011-12-16T20:21:22+01:00Eric Davis
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<strike><i>3.0.0</i></strike>)</li></ul><p>Bumping out of 3.0.0 until the code is ready for this.</p>