ChiliProject is not maintained anymore. Please be advised that there will be no more updates.

We do not recommend that you setup new ChiliProject instances and we urge all existing users to migrate their data to a maintained system, e.g. Redmine. We will provide a migration script later. In the meantime, you can use the instructions by Christian Daehn.

List of tasks filtered as OR and not AND (Feature #201)


Added by Alain V. at 2011-02-18 12:46 pm. Updated at 2011-12-18 07:35 pm.


Status:Open Start date:2011-02-18
Priority:Normal Due date:
Assignee:- % Done:

0%

Category:-
Target version:-
Remote issue URL:http://www.redmine.org/issues/4939 Affected version:

Description

Hello

Up to now in the list of task you can filter upon some values but the list of filters are
List of tasks that has
filter1=value1 AND filter2=value2 AND filter3=value3

I think it could be interesting to have the possibility of
List of tasks that has
filter1=value1 OR filter2=value2 OR filter3=value3

Do you think it is possible? thank you


Related issues

duplicated by Feature #713: Filtering - Or function Duplicate 2011-11-17

Associated revisions

Revision e5daf256
Added by Jean-Philippe Lang at 2008-02-17 03:17 pm

Fixes:
  • email notifications: host name is missing in generated links (#639, #201)
  • email notifications: referenced changesets, wiki pages, attachments... are not turned into links (only ticket ids are)
  • attachment links and inline images don't work in issue notes

git-svn-id: http://redmine.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk@1161 e93f8b46-1217-0410-a6f0-8f06a7374b81

History

Updated by Holger Just at 2011-12-18 07:35 pm

That would sure be an improvement of expressiveness. However, I'm a bit concerned whether it justifies the amount of work that would have to go into this feature. Having OR filters would seriously complicate the UI of the issues filter (even more so the internal implementation). So we would probably only consider it if there would be s strong use-case.

The current filters allow to set almost any combination of values for each field which solves the majority of cases. So I'm more inclined to add some of the missing combinations than to add a general OR.

Also available in: Atom PDF